CNN Fear & Greed Sentiment Analysis — 2026-09-15

Run Date: 2026-09-15 (Tuesday, 06:30 Beijing Time) Data As Of: 2026-09-11 (Friday, US Eastern close) Note: The 9/14 FNG reading has not yet been written to the historical series. All figures below reflect the latest verifiable data as of 9/11.


1. Changes This Period & Sustained Signals

Composite Index: 33.34 (Fear), up +1.14 from the prior observation on 9/10 (32.20).

  • The script reports previous_close=33.11, which conflicts with the historical series value of 32.20 on 9/10. Using the deduplicated historical series as source of truth, 9/11 rose approximately +1.1 point from 9/10.
  • Ten trading days ago (8/28) the composite was 53.74 (Neutral). Cumulative decline: -20.4 points, a rapid descent from Neutral into Fear territory.
  • Sample minimum: 5.17 (2025-11-20, Extreme Fear). The current reading remains ~28 points above the historical low.

Consecutive Fear Days: From 8/31 (49.20) to 9/11 (33.34), the composite stayed below 50 for 9 consecutive trading days. Of these, 9/1–9/11 carried a formal Fear rating (<40); 8/31 was borderline Neutral (49.20).

Sustained Signals:

  • Market momentum (SP500/SP125) remains in Fear, unchanged.
  • Stock price strength and breadth still in Extreme Fear.
  • Credit spreads hold in the normal zone (green).
  • Leverage signals (margin debt, ETF inflows) persist as red warnings.

2. Composite Index Trend

8/28  53.74  Neutral  ┐
8/31  49.20  Neutral  │
9/01  44.86  Fear     │  Rapid decline
9/02  46.06  Neutral  │
9/03  47.51  Neutral  │
9/04  45.23  Neutral  ├  Low-range consolidation
9/08  39.14  Fear     │
9/09  38.20  Fear     │
9/10  32.20  Fear  ──  Period low
9/11  33.34  Fear  ↑  Mild bounce

The 10-day trend is decisively down. After hitting a period low of 32.20 on 9/10, the composite bounced to 33.34 on 9/11, but remains in Fear territory—no confirmed trend reversal.

FNG Trend


3. Seven Sub-Index Details

Data as of 2026-09-11. Ratings follow the official score thresholds; raw values are not re-rated.

Sub-IndexScoreRatingRaw ValueUnitAs OfChange
SP500 Momentum28.8Fear7,656.98Level (1mo return mapped)9/11Sustained Fear
SP125 Momentum28.8Fear7,338.00Level (1mo return mapped)9/11Sustained Fear
Stock Price Strength5.0Extreme Fear-2.34% relative performance9/11Sustained Ext. Fear
Stock Price Breadth12.6Extreme Fear807.56Advancing stocks9/11Sustained Ext. Fear
Options P/C Ratio38.4Fear0.754Put/Call Volume Ratio9/11Sustained Fear
VIX50.0Neutral15.84Index value9/11Sustained Neutral
VIX 50-day Relative50.0Neutral16.14VIX vs 50-day MA9/11Sustained Neutral
Junk Bond Demand68.0Greed1.220HY OAS mapped9/11Sustained Greed
Safe Haven Demand30.6Fear0.610Equity-bond correlation9/11Sustained Fear

Notes:

  • VIX at 15.84 sits in the 12–20 Neutral band, forming a clear divergence from most sub-indices in Fear/Extreme Fear.
  • Junk bond demand flags Greed (HY OAS 1.22, narrow spread), diverging from Extreme Fear in equity breadth.
  • Stock price strength at -2.34% is the weakest sub-index this cycle.

Sub-Index Radar


4. Divergences: Possible Explanations & Counter-Evidence

Divergence 1: VIX Neutral vs. Strength/Breadth Extreme Fear

Explanation: VIX at 15.84 does not signal volatility panic. The deterioration in breadth (only 807 SP500 stocks advancing) and strength (-2.34% relative) points to a structural adjustment—capital rotating out of certain sectors into defensive names—rather than systemic panic.

Counter-evidence: If VIX is genuinely not panicking, breadth/strength weakness may be sector rotation, not a crash precursor. However, the 10-day cumulative -20-point drop suggests the adjustment is broadening. Watch for VIX slipping from Neutral into Fear (<12) or breaking above 20.

Divergence 2: Junk Bond Greed vs. Breadth Extreme Fear

Explanation: HY OAS at 1.22 (narrow credit spread) means fixed income markets are still pricing low default risk. Equity breadth worsening while credit markets don’t follow may indicate: (1) corporate fundamentals have not materially deteriorated; (2) flight-to-quality arbitrage from equities into credit.

Counter-evidence: The lead/lag relationship between credit and equity spreads is contested. If equity dislocation deepens and earnings estimates come down, HY OAS will likely widen. Monitor the weekly direction of FRED HY_OAS.


5. Credit / Rate / Leverage Cross-Validation

IndicatorValueSourceAs OfStatus
HY OAS2.65%FRED / crisis_signals9/11🟢 Normal
IG OAS0.80%FRED / crisis_signals9/11🟢 Normal
10Y Yield4.96%FRED / crisis_signals9/11Info
2Y Yield4.63%FRED / crisis_signals9/11Info
30Y Yield5.35%FRED / crisis_signals9/11Info
10Y-2Y Spread+0.32%Homogeneous calc.9/11🟢 Normal, flat
Margin Debt$1.304TFINRAApr 2026🔴 Near record high
IPOs (YTD)~73Renaissance Capital2026 YTD🔴 Active
ETF Net Inflows (YTD)$8,560BFund industry2026 YTD🔴 Record

Interpretation:

  • Credit spreads (HY/IG OAS) and the yield curve are in normal zones—no credit crisis signal.
  • 10Y-2Y at +0.32% (de-inverted), but 10Y-30Y at -0.39% (long-end inversion). Curve geometry is complex.
  • Margin debt at $1.304T (April 2026) sits near all-time highs, compounded by record ETF inflows—elevated leverage.
  • High leverage + Fear sentiment = asymmetric downside risk. A trigger event (earnings downgrades, weak macro data) could amplify selling.

Sub-Index Trends


6. Conditions for Risk Escalation or De-escalation

Watch for escalation if:

  1. VIX breaks 20 and holds → implied volatility enters Fear zone
  2. HY OAS突破 3% → credit markets begin pricing default risk
  3. Breadth stays below 600 advancing stocks for 5 consecutive days → adjustment broadens from structural to systemic
  4. Margin debt increases quarter-over-quarter → leverage continues building

Watch for de-escalation if:

  1. Composite closes above 40 for 3 consecutive days → return to Neutral threshold
  2. Stock price strength turns positive (>0%) → relative performance improving
  3. Breadth recovers to 1,200+ advancing stocks → declining breadth收敛
  4. VIX drops below 14 → volatility compression resumes

7. Data Limitations

  1. Lag: The FNG historical series last records 9/11; the 9/14 (last Friday) reading has not been updated. 9/15 (today, Monday) is an open session—closing data is not yet available.
  2. previous_close conflict: The script returns 33.11; the historical series shows 32.20 on 9/10. The source of the discrepancy (intraday snapshot vs. close) is unknown. The historical series is used as the reference.
  3. Margin debt is monthly: FINRA publishes monthly; the latest is April 2026. Interim changes are unknown.
  4. ETF inflows are YTD cumulative: They do not reflect recent flow velocity; a slowdown in weekly/monthly flows may already be underway.
  5. VIX data口径: The script uses market_volatility_vix (absolute VIX) and market_volatility_vix_50 (relative to 50-day MA). Both score 50 (Neutral), but the raw levels 15.84/16.14 require a longer lookback for context.
  6. Sub-index raw-to-score mapping not independently verified: SP500/SP125 momentum point levels to score conversion depends on the script’s internal logic.
  7. Safe haven demand (equity-bond correlation) scoring thresholds are not publicly disclosed; score=30.6’s specific meaning requires reference to CNN’s original methodology document.